Independent technical audits of construction projects — verifying that your supervision consultant’s procedures, documentation, and deliverables comply with the contract. Milestone-based visits, not a resident team. Across the GCC and Iraq.
On most projects in the region, the supervision consultant comes from the same firm that produced the design. That team verifies construction against its own drawings — and no one on the org chart is positioned to ask whether the drawings, procedures, or approvals themselves hold up. An independent technical audit closes that gap: a third party, mandated by you, reviewing how the project is actually being controlled — without adding a resident team to your payroll. Audit visits, not salaries.
We review the supervision consultant’s working machinery against the contract and the approved project plans — not to replace them, but to give the owner independent evidence that project controls are real.

Contracts define deliverables; audits verify they exist, in the right form, at the right time. We build a compliance matrix from your contract and score the project’s documentation against it.

Milestone-based site inspections that sample the physical work against what the reports say — scoped tightly, scheduled around the project’s real decision points.

Every audit closes with a graded findings report — each observation evidence-referenced, risk-rated, and assigned — plus an action tracker the project team can actually work from. No essay-style reports. Findings, evidence, owner, deadline.
We audit only where the Prime group is neither the contractor nor the supervision consultant on the project. Our mandate comes from the owner, our findings answer to the owner, and our fee is never tied to what we find.
When an audit surfaces gaps in testing records or system readiness, the natural next step is independent verification of the systems themselves. Our Testing & Commissioning practice picks up exactly where the audit stops — one team, one standard of evidence.
An independent, owner-mandated review of how a project is being controlled — the supervision consultant’s procedures, the documentation trail, and contract compliance — verified through milestone-based site visits rather than a resident team.
No. TPI in this region usually means certified inspection of materials, welding, or lifting equipment by accredited bodies. A technical audit reviews the project’s control system — supervision procedures, documents, and contract compliance — at the project-management level.
No. Supervision stays fully in place. We provide the owner an independent check that supervision is doing what the contract requires — most findings strengthen the existing team’s position, not undermine it.
Yes. For financed projects, milestone verification reports are structured to support disbursement decisions. For donor- and multilateral-funded programs, audits follow third-party monitoring practice: evidence-referenced findings mapped to the program’s results and compliance framework.
Typically at milestones — monthly or at defined stage gates — scoped to the project’s size and risk. That’s the point: audit-level assurance at a fraction of the cost of a resident engineer.
The contract and its QA/QC requirements, access to the project documentation system, and a short mandate letter authorizing the audit — we provide a template.